26 Mai 2015 00:52:59
________________________________________________________________________

Thomas Goßmann
Sodensternstr.16
34125 Kassel
Deutschland

Report to Tesla Museum Belgrade: Influencing Quantum Mechanical Randomness

Dear physics student (tour guide May9th 2015),

thanks for tour in museum.
It seems you donīt really have "science-fiction"-stuff that contradicts official physics.
Maybe I can help you. And you can help me in discussion with Mr.Zeilinger.
I gave you keyword "Peoch", did you find "L'esprit agit sur la matiere" at youtube?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkT7lu4eEvI

picture I showed you:

Youīre right, the first thought is some sophisticated electromagnetic influence from chick brain to random generator.
According to official theory, it is no surprise if "bio"photons (just photons, but from organisms, with very specialized frequency (and maybe shape) and weak intensity, such that they can e.g. kill eggs from rival fish nests) from the chick brain have a highly nonlinear influence on QM-systems.
So if thereīs a chick brain and something happens in an electronic device, no principal problem.

But: First, I donīt know how much energy is needed to change the randomness of very many electrons in the generator. (Maybe more than a few photons.)
And secondly, more important: how does the brain system know, which photons to send in order to get the desired macroscopic result? The brain must have a plan of the random generator QM-system, in order to decide: "I must send these photons, because in x ns (depending on exact distance) the generator electrons will be in that state."

I think the problem is not solvable. If the chicks send photons, such that the right nonlinear macroscopic result appears, they must have a plan of the generator state, e.g. by some very new, very advanced kind of entanglement. That alone would be a Nobel price.

The easier theory is, that we have a new kind of force. I call it "the lowest Bohm1990- super quantum level" or "psycho exchange particles" (independently seen by several people).
Zeilinger agreed that influencing randomness leads to superluminal communication (according to ruling theory, via entanglement, because sent bits are not random anymore), but just disbelieved the chicks experiment. And ran away, and I suspect fat fishes in progress.

But slowly: First, the chicks experiment must be reproduced (attempts seem not to exist).
Then, force must be exerted to single photons (or bigger entangled systems).
Then, superluminality or other contradictions to theory can be accomplished.
To get the chicks into the accelerator (time paradox according to Einstein), one must replace chicks by electronic devices, which should be possible according to experimental results.
I started calculating this at volkscomputer.biz/4/4.html#Sep14 , but donīt get paid.

How to proceed:
I talked to 3 german physicists, among them two professors, and one Austrian, but they ran away or tried to talk me into being an idiot. Thatīs enough, according to any decent theory, so I must take other measures:
I suggest a cooperation of universities Belgrade, Kassel (, and maybe another east european uni), such that:
a) you and Belgrade professors agree on high priority of Peoch reproduction, and give me recommendation (written or telephone call to Prof. , head of "quantum  " Uni Kassel, she seems competent, didnīt talk to her because of other physicists).
b) reproduction of chicks experiment at my old school, with grade-13-pupils (future physics students), with recommendation of Prof. ..
c) I found "Bohm Super-Quantum Institute" at Uni Kassel with help of Prof. .. . Anything I do in Germany, Iīll also do in Belgrade (parallel), as promised to serbian friends and serbian army.

Would be nice to hear from you, or meet next time in Belgrade
Thomas Goßmann